lack-of-utility rejection
Rejection of a patent claim on the ground that the invention is inoperative, frivolous, fraudulent, or against the public interest.
? The classic examples are perpetual-motion machines (inoperative), cures for the common cold (frivolous because believed impossible, and also probably fraudulent), and gambling devices (formerly seen as against the public interest). [Cases: Patents 46. C.J.S. Patents ¡ì 59.]
How do Chinese lawyers translate the term lack-of-utility rejection?
About LegalLingo
LegalLingo, a Shanghai-based translation agency, is a recognized leader in comprehensive legal language solutions for the legal industry. We provide the world’s leading law firms and corporate legal teams with a full suite of services, ranging from the translation of contracts and compliance documentation to full-scale multilingual litigation requiring certified translation and Chinese document review. We deliver customized legal document translation solutions based on your case’s size and budget requirements, utilizing industry-leading technology to ensure accuracy, lower costs and faster turnaround times.